P.S.I Investigations Blog and Posts
Hi there, My name is Harry and this is where we share our real life stories, provide helpful tips, and share insights that will hopefully inspire and entertain you.
We have often uncovered instances where the state, its agents, and/or law enforcement, have engaged in corrupt practices, employed improper procedures, presented insufficient evidence, or conducted inadequate investigations.
See them here.
A criminal defense investigators primary objective is to uncover facts and evidence that either exonerates the accused individual … or substantiates claims of the states misconduct, negligence, or incompetence.
See them here.
How a Vulnerable Woman Was Blamed for a Crime She Didn’t Commit
Some cases reveal not just the failures of an investigation, but the failures of a system that should protect the vulnerable. Jane’s story is one of those cases.
She was a young African immigrant trying to survive the harsh reality of city streets. Jane is a young African woman being taken advantage of by her fellow immigrants and pursued for trespassing by local police. She had no family here, no safety net, and no one looking out for her.
Every morning she walked to the local mission for a meal, pulling her suitcase behind her — everything she owned in one rolling bag. That mission was where she found others like her, people chasing the American dream while living day to day. It was also where she found casual work, the only income she had.
But it was also where she crossed paths with danger.
Two days before the incident, Jane had been attacked by a man named Joe - pepper‑sprayed and struck with brass knuckles when she refused to hand over her money. But, he took it anyway. Police responded, but they were understaffed and never followed up.
On the morning of the stabbing, Jane was simply walking to the local mission when Joe stepped out of the alley and confronted her again. He grabbed her suitcase and threw it into the street, scattering her clothes into traffic. Terrified and humiliated, she ran.
Minutes later, Joe exited the corner store and headed back toward the alley. Someone lunged at him, slashing his throat and leaving him bleeding on the sidewalk.
Jane was nowhere near him.
But that didn’t stop police from arresting her.
Police recovered a weapon, surveillance footage, eyewitness statements, and physical evidence. They determined the assailant had arrived and fled on a bicycle. They also saw the earlier confrontation between Jane and Joe.
That was enough for them.
Jane was located, arrested, and charged with first‑degree assault.
Her only “motive” was being a victim.
We were retained under the county indigent defense program to investigate the case. What we found dismantled the prosecution’s theory piece by piece.
First, the surveillance footage:
The assailant, meanwhile, had appeared in the alley before the stabbing and before Jane’s encounter with Joe.
Next, the physical evidence:
The evidence painted a clear picture:
Joe was involved in criminal activity, and Jane was one of his victims - not his attacker.
Despite the inconsistencies, missing evidence, and contradictions we uncovered, the prosecutor insisted on taking the case to trial.
But the jury saw what the investigation revealed.
Jane was acquitted of all charges.
She walked out of that courtroom the same way she walked into the mission every morning - alone, carrying everything she owned - but this time, with her freedom intact.
Jane’s story is a reminder that justice is not automatic. It must be fought for.
Whether someone is wealthy or indigent, documented or undocumented, fluent or struggling with English, “a vigorous defense is always your best bet.”
And sometimes, it’s the only thing standing between an innocent person and a wrongful conviction.
